Unscrewing the science with an Open Stance is simply an eventuality. As the universe, which God spoke into existence in ONE VERSE, flashes into and out of reality at 22,000,000 times a second, we seek to explain physical reality with something called science. We have applied theory in individual disciplines, to support our own conclusions, all trying to support our claims.

Thus far, no one has come up with a cogent argument to answer, for instance, why the suns shine. Nuclear explosions? I’m afraid not. Nuclear explosions which continue constantly, at a sun level, are not supported by or occur under ‘general relativity’. No sun should be MUCH warmer than the ambient space around it, which is justifiable by the nature of the physics that are proffered by general relativity.

We screwed ourselves by compartmentalizing theories and associated languages within each. I won’t readdress the economic reason at this time. However, on the level of enlightenment, we eschewed deeper thinking for the convenience of immediate gratification. Mass Media offered a person in celebrity and the language they spoke as gospel. Eventually, I believe the luminaries Einstein, Edison, etc. will be supplanted by the real genius of Boskovich and Tesla, who had the sense to pursue great thought.

In the mean time, we have to spend our time unscrewing the science foisted upon us by chosen celebrities and their language. Notice I accused their language right along with them? That means it was never a natural part of them. Correct. Focusing human minds on Earthly pursuits too often requires wrapping up complexity in a nice box, pretty ribbon and screwy language and presenting it as a settled matter. That’s the methodology of nearly every scientific discipline.

Furthermore, the math keeps getting more and more bizarre to try to make this shit make sense. For example, Eric Weinstein, a Joe Rogan regular, is always complaining that no one takes his theory on “Unified Geometry” seriously. Never mind that his horse shit theory tries to reconcile the unreconcilable, i.e. quantum mechanics and relativity. Likewise, with every compartmentalized conclusion we make, we have to make up progressively more bizarre shit to make it make sense. Golf instructors too, have done the same thing to the golfing public for over seventy years.

We followed Hogan into the abyss based on his ‘secret’. Never mind he never mentioned it. He knew his ‘secret’ was specific to his action. Sharing his secret as an objective truth would have done a YUGE amount of damage to the golfing public, and he may have been paving the way for Homer Kelley to do it for him.

Golfers lost objectivity after reading Kelley’s work – based on his language regarding WHAT happens. The Golfing Machine was a perfect vehicle for stupefying golfers into accepting incuriosity and implementing a subjective opinion about their golf swings. “What works for me is….”

Later, golfing masses applied fixes and word pictures offered by McLean, Ledbetter, Ballard, Haney, and the rest. Their ‘school’ of thought, delivered publicly by mainstream mass media, was their clever spin on prior short-cuts. Our culture interpreted cleverness as simplicity instead of stall-tactics. Therefore, we tendered our awakening to a later date.

Eventually, all these bedazzled and bowed Schroedinger’s golfing boxes, screwed up our golf swing language and scientific knowledge. Apparently, we were not smart enough or curious enough to pursue the actual evidence. Thus, imprecise thinking allowed hypothecation of more and more bizarre language.

Over the next century, my work will serve as a basis for cleaning up our language surrounding our golf swing and unscrewing the science. Future players and teachers will use my multidisciplinary approach to help people on their path. And, before you instructors out there start arguing that we do that already, let me remind you of the origin and not the application of our golf swing. Golfers will see as objective that which was taught subjectively in our recent past.

Until then, enjoy your Open Stance golf. You are initiators. Early adopters are on board and healing. Read my other articles and posts and see where you are on the continuum to freedom from instruction. You teacher is waiting. Remember that dissonance means distance from truth. If my language sounds familiar or by some chance, comforting, then your curiosity is increasing and you are reeling in the truth.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

They Said “Open Stance”! It’s a Miracle!

Explaining The Value of An Open Stance From an Economic Point of View

Lee Trevino Recommends a Flatter Swing

It’s a house of cards. Need I say more. I’m sure my readers are rapidly connecting everything in our world upon which we can slap this moniker. But, how does it apply to the Open Stance? That’s as easy to explain as the effect of Gold and Silver on fiat.

The Open Stance is the cure for the profligacy of an industry that mirrors every other under fiat. It will either destroy or become the insurance for every learning transaction hereafter. That must sound pretty bold on that side of my keyboard, but my students know it’s true.

Tour players are proving Open Stance value weekly. My comment section has been completely absent of spam or derision since our founding. NO ONE can, apparently, disagree. Isn’t that interesting?

By the way, I believe Jon Rahm is too close to his ball on his full swing. Spread the news. Whoever suggested crowding his ball fell asleep, I guess. But man, can that guy roll it or what? Wow! Magic.

As far as how the house of cards falls, the walls come down the moment someone breaks from the narrative and utters the “Open Stance Academy” on TV. Otherwise, the timeline extends. But the constant, instructional “fiat-printing” only ends one way. Just as in ancient times, at the end of the bread and circus, people wake up and realize what they allowed from their rulers.

And now, just as in ancient times, we are on the precipice of the same realization regarding truth and justice, money and paper, industry and community. When we look back on golfing history and the folly of clever tips and word-pictures, sales and marketing, fads and fiction, we will come to one understanding with the Open Stance presiding over the landscape….

In the collapse of instruction’s deceit will the golfing world, at last, be freed.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

Why Do We Love New Ideas Like “The Open Stance”?

Open Stance Key Benefits

Our Shoulders Hook Our Golf Ball, Not Our Hands

Lead With Your Hands Using Set-Up Alone

The Open Stance dominates professional golf. Normally, I’d say (A player) dominates professional golf. But, when linked to the number of players winning the vast majority of tournaments over the last decade, I default to the common denominator – The Open Stance.

By the way, have you seen the players the Open Stance is employing right now? Here are a few…

I could have played Rory, Shane, Justin, Kurt, Xander… line em up. It’s not the fade. The fade is incidental – important for consistency, yes – but incidental to the underlying and facilitating Open Stance. The Open Stance dominates professional golf because the players who win most set up open. And, players who set up open are players who understand either physics or history.

Have you noticed that, although Coli-Mo is rollin his rock, he fades at the end of tournaments? It’s because his set-up is not most important to his coach. He’s trying to hit a fade from a closed feet/open shoulder position – NOT good.

I’d say the same for poor Jordan Speith. He has wasted three years of listening to Cameron McCormick tell him his move was the problem when it was his set-up. All he had to do was open his stance. But that was too simple, I guess.

First, McC had Jordan start laying the club off. THEN, Jordan tried to play from an open stance while laying the club off. I think Cameron allowed it so any implosion in ball-striking precision he could blame on the Open Stance instead of his club-contortions. THEN, post-implosion, McC closed his stance back up. Meanwhile, the pressure Jordan’s tee-to-green game put on his putting squeezed his putting confidence.

I swear none of these sponsor-sanctioned coaches have the players best interests in mind. If they really cared about their clients, they’d turn them over to me. But, that’s not gonna happen unless they start hating fame and fortune. LOL.

And, oh my God! Have you seen Bads? Oh, that poor guy just has the most beautiful short game, but absolutely no chance from t-t-g. He hits it DHTAG (Low) on courses requiring the high-soft approach. I root so hard for him being the great human being that he is. But, really now… who is he listening to!? I wish him volumes of luck in his current state.

That’s enough for today. Best Wishes,

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

Patrick Cantlay Used His Open Stance To Win The Tour Championship

Rory Does It Tooooooooooo!

Paul Azinger Won With an Open Stance, Too

I want to spend a minute to go over how golf instruction destroyed your putting. As a well-publicized cynic, larger cycles and seminal events predicate all my current thinking. “The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” – Churchill

“Accelerate through the ball.” Do you ever wonder why so many people wave at their ball with huge follow throughs? We shouldn’t be surprised that our distance and club face control is erratic today. The mental and physical tension created by implying such control-is-our-goal is ludicrous.

“Take your wrists out of your stroke.” Again, distracting us from impact by recommending we control another part of our body ruined putting worldwide. Instructors cite green speeds as rationalization for their bad advice and our putting culprit when no material improvement occurs. Contrarily, I proved years ago that a wrist stroke works on greens of ANY speed and is VERY “LINE ACCURATE”. Why? I’ll get to that later.

“You/he got the YIPS”. Often blamed on the use of our wrists, the “YIPS” was and is a malady without causality. The YIPS are essentially the PTSD of putting and are nothing more than the brain trying to do something that doesn’t make sense to our soul. Trying to control what is natural is our cause. Further, we allowed instructors throughout modern history to make us doubt our natural instincts under the premise that we can’t do it on our own. LIES!

“Your follow through should be as long as your back swing.” Feeding off the “Acceleration” theme, follow through ideas like this one put golfers squarely in their own heads. Unfortunately, instructors convinced us, once again, that if we could control our bodies (distracting us from truth) we could improve our putting. I’ll get to the truth in a second.

The truth is this. The less we move, the more precise we will be. For example, there is a reason those little three-foot slap-ins at the end of a hole work so well without reading a green. Heel-shafted small-headed putters were the standard seventy years ago. Do you ever wonder if that was just a coincidence?

Do you ever wonder why MOI, rubber inserts and fast greens are all the rage today? All of those technological “Improvements” make putting on fast greens an absolute nightmare for the average golfer. Your golf ball EXPLODES off your cushy putter face today. And here is the thing… that was always the plan.

Every golf and instructional technology is designed to BREAK YOUR GAME INTO A THOUSAND PIECES and make you a prisoner of your own mind. Do you NOT feel overloaded with tips and advice about how to move by not moving and the personalities advising you!? Well, at least instruction charlatans are making a good living and getting famous on your account, huh?

There is only one truth in putting…. Our maximum club head speed should be AT contact – not before, not after. In fact, all other instructions are part and parcel of our only putting truth. Without advocating movement, I will tell you that once you become aware of your peak speed, your putting stroke and results will migrate toward your own ideal and free you of your mind forever.

You and I are responsible for terrible things like Hank Haney. If we are to redeem our spirits and souls, we must stop the madness, exit the instructional merry-go-round, and get back to basics. Set-up, Swing, Strike, and Learn. Fortunately, we have some time.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

If Putting Wins, Why Worry About Full-Swing Set-Up?

“A Lie Can Travel Half Way Around The World While The Truth Is Still Putting On Its Shoes.”

Psychology of Open Stance Golfers

How much improvement can one day with OSA create? For Adamo… this much. You’re seeing his longest ten shots per club.

Day One was Evaluation Day. Day Two was Lesson Day. Adamo has a 4 Handicap with a good short game. His goal is to lower his HCP to 0. I am confident he will… and then from the back tees, as well.

Adamo flew from Canada to see me in Florida for a rain and wind shortened OSA School. We had two days instead of three to connect intention with improvement. He is very athletic and made changes quickly. We worked eight hours each day discussing all things from concept to execution.

We distilled his learning into a couple key points, and I wrote up a complete summary for his continued, self-driven achievement. He received his swing and practice videos in the form of a movie. I also sent his complete FlightScope and evaluation data so that no one will ever know more than he does about his game.

Adamo would have to tell you about his growth in knowledge. He said he wanted to leave with all the information I had in my head. He’s highly intelligent, but ‘everything’ would leave little mind-space for our athletic pursuit. I don’t want to wreck perfectly good brains, so I covered his inquiries only. Good stuff.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

Psychology of Open Stance Golfers

Bruce and Specific Intention

First Things First: Create an Intent for Your Game

They said “Open Stance”! It’s a Miracle! Roger Maltby, or another President’s Cup commentator, announced how encouraged he was that one of the players on the US side utilized an Open Stance in a successful bunker shot (Max Homa). He said, ‘He was set up open, which is nice to see.’ I couldn’t believe my ears! They finally okayed its use. WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO!? I’ll tell you what it means…. They’re all coming home, that’s what.

It was only a matter of time. Though my goal was never to introduce nomenclature or word-smithery, efficiency of language alone requires the easiest possible way to say something. For the better part of a decade, NO ONE uttered the words “Open Stance” on network television. It really started to bother me – not because what they were saying was incorrect, but rather because their terminology was so inefficient, especially considering an existing term, which commentators refused to use, already existed.

Hopefully, we are collectively past the verbose phase of golf commentary. After all, using “Open” as a set-up description applies both to right and left-handed golfers. “Open” describes a set-up and, therefore, takes far less time to say than “aiming left” or “aiming right”.

Inevitably, the commentator has to remind the viewer that the ultimate target is still the desired destination. And, their expanded description assumes they don’t stumble over their words trying to remind themselves of each golfer’s dexterity before they speak. No, no, no… it’s too much work.

Better to use the same efficiency philosophy upon which The Open Stance Academy was founded. However, The Open Stance Academy does not own the words Open Stance. At least, I’d never make that claim. My dad taught me using that term. I teach my students using that term. It’s easier. The only distinction I draw between the term and the promoter is their knowledge about the golf swing and the secret in the Open Stance.

Yours truly is the World’s foremost proprietor of Open Stance learning. I am the original. I am the only. Furthermore, those thinking they have the knowledge to purvey themselves as a like guru is provably deficient. However, if you believe I’m wrong, I’d be happy to debate you and any other intellect you’d like to bring with you in a public forum at a time or place of your choosing. Thanks to advances in recording devices and social media, I doubt anyone will step to the plate. But, here’s to hoping someone does.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

Billy Ho Is Setting Up Open, But Nobody Will Say The Word!

In a World of Motion Sensors, One Idea Stands Out – The Open Stance

Lee Trevino Recommends a Flatter Swing

Why do we love new ideas like “The Open Stance”? Certainly, novelty attracts people. New ideas are food for our brains, to, I suppose. Do we enjoy considering the pros and cons, sloppiness or precision within each kernel? Whatever our attraction to new or different ways of thinking, we love expressing our own interpretive understanding once we agree.

I might contend that we love them for the same reason we love stories of buried treasure. The Atoche Motherlode, Chocolate Mountain, Grand Canyon, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and more stoke our imaginations with possibility and adventure. How something lost to the mist of time can once again bring riches to the adventurous… it’s exciting.

I might also contend we love them like we love new shoes. Minolo Blahniks, Jimmy Choos, Air Jordans, Allen Edmonds et al provide us opportunity to show off. We certainly express the relationship of the shoe to our body or style differently than anyone else – even if we are wearing the same shoe. Hence, when we recognize and purchase quality shoes, employing them is its own reward.

Or, is our love of new ideas more like our fondness for vacation? Time away from everyday reality happens in many different forms and locations even though, and I assume, percentages of budgets are equally affected. We accumulate adventurous or romantic (treasured) stories to retell friends and family. Ultimately, our vacations are interpreted to be totally unique to us like a Ferragamo to a foot. However, we are all left with memories.

Come to think of it, the Open Stance is an idea much like the others. First, we can polish off a treasure lost in time and join golf’s greats of the past while we pursue our own present. Putting ourselves in the shoes of Vardon, Young Tom Morris, Francis Ouimet, and Bobby Jones can transport us to a more innocent time in our history that technology can never touch.

Second, we can try it on to see how it makes us feel and look. Maybe we’re stagnating and need a stylistic change. We sense we need new colors and new material to adorn our stodgy swings. And, granted, maybe the Open Stance is not the most comfortable platform, but who cares… look how good we look in it!

And third, the Open Stance is portable. Success arrives at home or away. Therefore, whether we’re at St. Andrews, Royal Melbourne, or an out-of-state muni, memories leave us with unique stories of adventure wherever we choose to land.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

Why Is The Chip And Run Recommended ? Think Of Your Best Answer, And I’ll Tell You Next Week.

Why The Open Stance Controls Your Trailing Elbow

Constantly Asking “Why” Identifies Knowledge

The Psychology of Open Stance golfers is different, to say the least, from all others – but in a good way. For those just joining the conversation, this blog/website is home to enlightened reasoning. We are the ambassadors of golf instruction’s ending if you agree with my logic.

My Cambridge-based psychologist friend/student assured me years ago that my perceptions and diagnoses of her anonymous cases are “very insightful”. Therefore, I ask you all give me some rope here. My intended point is to discriminate. Furthermore, I believe discrimination is due to make a YUGE comeback in years to come. It is VERY necessary. Discriminating ideas feeds critical thinking – ALSO due for a comeback.

Every human endeavor has a psychological component. Psychology is a part of every process because it follows Intention and precedes Mathematics on the curve of knowable truth. Although I cannot locate my graph at present, it is in my book, The Open Stance and Three Short Game Lessons. I extrapolated the graph included in Stephen Arroyo’s Person to Person Astrology. Do not think psychology and astrology are mutually exclusive. They are very different but cooperative disciplines within any complete process of discovery.

Psychology is the terminus of generalized explanation of esoteric processes beginning at our inexplicable Novel and Lyric. Psychology pulls from Anthropological research, and acts as a bridge to measured explanations of human differences found in individuals’ Astrological charting. Each more knowable truth either proves or disproves less-knowable truths. By this measure I will attempt to explain the psychology of Open Stance golfers.

Employing an Open Stance means we trust our ability to discriminate messaging between public sources of information. Open Stance golfers are un-“sellable”. No one can paw at or romance them into buying anything. They are self-contained, self-driven units. They believe, intrinsically, that we have all the intelligence and adaptability needed to make new ideas work. By the way, they also know the difference between an idea and a suggestion.

Ideas present to us a blank canvas. Suggestion seeks to bias our decision-making like my Velvet Elvis paint-by-numbers kit. Bias, in our ball-striking process, means manipulate. Open Stance golfers are beyond manipulation by suggestion. We like to make sense of WHY to do something before we invest our time. When we pursue our individual “WHY”, we seek to test our entire inquisition of Who, What, When Where, and How. Our pursuit is more akin to intellectual honesty than chasing suggestions.

Then what may we infer about our psychology? I will separate us from first person to make it less urgent. I do not want to cause a fuss, after all. When doing what they’re told no longer appeals, they solve problems themselves. But, not without help. Consider the following facets of their process of improvement.

Their help has to be open to individual interpretation and innovation. Each example must be unique per individual. Otherwise, empowerment runs into resistance. Therefore, they look toward their subconscious or unconscious mind for answers. As a result, Open Stance golfers source information closer to the beginning of their universal adaptive process than numbers or even psychology can measure or record.

Open Stance scholars gathered here are never told how to move and are never given drills. Movement options must cooperate with their preceding intent and motivational need. Common to all human endeavors is the neutralizing nature of foundation, framework, and order. One cannot exist without the other. In building their own golf swings, Open Stance golfers only require set-up, mental and physical adaptation, application of motion, and feedback. They make incremental change rooted in one set-up philosophy.

Each expression of athletic adaptation occurs within a constant control group of foundation, framework, and order. Open Stance golfers are logical and focused on achieving understanding rather than just ‘difference’. Therefore, they judge their results from a mental, physical, and psychological point of view. OS golfers use psychology to endure the struggle of lasting change. They master their minds. Conversely, those who chase fixes seek to ease the psychology of change. They are subject to their minds.

More to come.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

The Fastest Way to Lose Your Golfing Mind

Bruce and Specific Intention

Byron Nelson Wanted to Buy a Farm