Set-Up With Motion vs. Motion With Drills

Recently, I’ve been discussing the difference between my teaching and instruction everywhere else, and I came up with this…. I teach set-up, and use motion to help people adapt. Instructors around the world tell people how to move, and use drills to cultivate their desired motion.

To me motion is incidental. Philosophy is primary, because philosophy reveals intention and need. My goal is to empower every golfer to pursue their own, unique solution to an Open Stance. And, no matter what level the golfer, all people are athletic and pursue their solution logically when attached to their sensory systems.

Interestingly, I only recommend an Open Stance to break inefficient swing habits. However, not one self-healer ever turned away from the one, proven best set-up orientation to a square or closed, swing-breaking set-up. Why do you suppose that is? Additionally, why keep it to yourself?

There IS no failure from an Open Stance when balance, leading arm extension, weight shift, plane adherence, and square club face are in tow. Isn’t that wonderful? To know you cannot fail to reach your ball-striking goal via an objective, left-brained solution is unheard of! No more achieving motion with drills!

The Open Stance saves our golfing bodies, creates a flatter swing, more lag, less rotation, equal power, more shaft-lean, distance, and satisfaction with no major swing change! I don’t mandate ANY swing change. I give options to my students and go over the requirements to achieve any given choice of motion-solution. They choose.

Open your stance, and play golf.

John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy

Refer any question to my book.
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=The+open+stance+and+three+short+game+lessons&ref=nb_sb_noss

Sponges Are Indiscriminate
Our Pretending Is Ending
This Is Why Gurbaaz Mann Is The World’s Best Club-Fitter