Unscrewing the science with an Open Stance is simply an eventuality. As the universe, which God spoke into existence in ONE VERSE, flashes into and out of reality at 22,000,000 times a second, we seek to explain physical reality with something called science. We have applied theory in individual disciplines, to support our own conclusions, all trying to support our claims.
Thus far, no one has come up with a cogent argument to answer, for instance, why the suns shine. Nuclear explosions? I’m afraid not. Nuclear explosions which continue constantly, at a sun level, are not supported by or occur under ‘general relativity’. No sun should be MUCH warmer than the ambient space around it, which is justifiable by the nature of the physics that are proffered by general relativity.
We screwed ourselves by compartmentalizing theories and associated languages within each. I won’t readdress the economic reason at this time. However, on the level of enlightenment, we eschewed deeper thinking for the convenience of immediate gratification. Mass Media offered a person in celebrity and the language they spoke as gospel. Eventually, I believe the luminaries Einstein, Edison, etc. will be supplanted by the real genius of Boskovich and Tesla, who had the sense to pursue great thought.
In the mean time, we have to spend our time unscrewing the science foisted upon us by chosen celebrities and their language. Notice I accused their language right along with them? That means it was never a natural part of them. Correct. Focusing human minds on Earthly pursuits too often requires wrapping up complexity in a nice box, pretty ribbon and screwy language and presenting it as a settled matter. That’s the methodology of nearly every scientific discipline.
Furthermore, the math keeps getting more and more bizarre to try to make this shit make sense. For example, Eric Weinstein, a Joe Rogan regular, is always complaining that no one takes his theory on “Unified Geometry” seriously. Never mind that his horse shit theory tries to reconcile the unreconcilable, i.e. quantum mechanics and relativity. Likewise, with every compartmentalized conclusion we make, we have to make up progressively more bizarre shit to make it make sense. Golf instructors too, have done the same thing to the golfing public for over seventy years.
We followed Hogan into the abyss based on his ‘secret’. Never mind he never mentioned it. He knew his ‘secret’ was specific to his action. Sharing his secret as an objective truth would have done a YUGE amount of damage to the golfing public, and he may have been paving the way for Homer Kelley to do it for him.
Golfers lost objectivity after reading Kelley’s work – based on his language regarding WHAT happens. The Golfing Machine was a perfect vehicle for stupefying golfers into accepting incuriosity and implementing a subjective opinion about their golf swings. “What works for me is….”
Later, golfing masses applied fixes and word pictures offered by McLean, Ledbetter, Ballard, Haney, and the rest. Their ‘school’ of thought, delivered publicly by mainstream mass media, was their clever spin on prior short-cuts. Our culture interpreted cleverness as simplicity instead of stall-tactics. Therefore, we tendered our awakening to a later date.
Eventually, all these bedazzled and bowed Schroedinger’s golfing boxes, screwed up our golf swing language and scientific knowledge. Apparently, we were not smart enough or curious enough to pursue the actual evidence. Thus, imprecise thinking allowed hypothecation of more and more bizarre language.
Over the next century, my work will serve as a basis for cleaning up our language surrounding our golf swing and unscrewing the science. Future players and teachers will use my multidisciplinary approach to help people on their path. And, before you instructors out there start arguing that we do that already, let me remind you of the origin and not the application of our golf swing. Golfers will see as objective that which was taught subjectively in our recent past.
Until then, enjoy your Open Stance golf. You are initiators. Early adopters are on board and healing. Read my other articles and posts and see where you are on the continuum to freedom from instruction. You teacher is waiting. Remember that dissonance means distance from truth. If my language sounds familiar or by some chance, comforting, then your curiosity is increasing and you are reeling in the truth.
John Wright – Founder
The Open Stance Academy
They Said “Open Stance”! It’s a Miracle!
Explaining The Value of An Open Stance From an Economic Point of View
Lee Trevino Recommends a Flatter Swing